Provided in conjunction with the GLW October 31, 2022 comments to the CPUC on proposed 2023 – 2024 TPP portfolios.
On December 2, 2022, GridLiance West submitted comments in the CPUC IRP proceeding. GridLiance West performed RESOLVE runs as discussed in those comments to determine the siting results from, and the benefits of, increases of the Southern Nevada transmission capability. GridLiance West’s filed comments and the RESOLVE input and output files for these scenarios are provided for downloading below:
On January 14, 2022, GridLiance West submitted comments in the CPUC IRP proceeding. GridLiance West performed RESOLVE runs as discussed in those comments to determine the siting results from, and the benefits of, increases of the Southern Nevada transmission capability. GridLiance West’s filed comments and the RESOLVE input and output files for these scenarios are provided for downloading below:
GridLiance West January 14, 2022 Comments
38MMT_20210708_PSP_LSEplan_HighElec_UpgradeLimit_2076Inc_2035_2040 Part 1
38 MMT RESOLVE case where GridLiance West tested modifications to the Southern Nevada transmission capabilities, examining the portfolio impacts of, and cost savings of, incremental Southern Nevada upgrade capability.
38MMT_20210708_PSP_LSEplan_HighElec_UpgradeLimit_2076Inc_2035_2040 Part 2
38 MMT RESOLVE case where GridLiance West tested modifications to the Southern Nevada transmission capabilities, examining the portfolio impacts of, and cost savings of, incremental Southern Nevada upgrade capability.
38MMT_20210708_PSP_LSEplan_HighElec_UpgradeLimit_2076Inc_2035_2040 Part 3
38 MMT RESOLVE case where GridLiance West tested modifications to the Southern Nevada transmission capabilities, examining the portfolio impacts of, and cost savings of, incremental Southern Nevada upgrade capability.
30MMT_20210715_PSP_LSEplan_HighElec_UpgradeLimit_2076Inc_2035_2040 Part 1
3O MMT RESOLVE case where GridLiance West tested the same modifications to the Southern Nevada transmission capabilities, examining the portfolio impacts of, and cost savings of, incremental Southern Nevada upgrade capability.
30MMT_20210715_PSP_LSEplan_HighElec_UpgradeLimit_2076Inc_2035_2040 Part 2
3O MMT RESOLVE case where GridLiance West tested the same modifications to the Southern Nevada transmission capabilities, examining the portfolio impacts of, and cost savings of, incremental Southern Nevada upgrade capability.
30MMT_20210715_PSP_LSEplan_HighElec_UpgradeLimit_2076Inc_2035_2040 Part 3
3O MMT RESOLVE case where GridLiance West tested the same modifications to the Southern Nevada transmission capabilities, examining the portfolio impacts of, and cost savings of, incremental Southern Nevada upgrade capability.
On September 27, 2021 GridLiance West submitted reply comments in a CPUC IRP proceeding. GridLiance West performed RESOLVE runs as discussed in those reply comments. GridLiance West’s filed comments and the RESOLVE input and output files for these scenarios are provided for downloading below:
GridLiance West September 27, 2021 Comments
38MMT_20210708_PSP_LSEplan_Rerun
RESOLVE case where GridLiance West performed a rerun of the CPUC’s case 38MMT_20210708_PSP_LSEplan case based on E3 staff recommendation regarding model stability.
38MM_20210708_PSP_LSEplanSNVGeo1000
RESOLVE case where GridLiance West modified the rerun of the 38MMT_20210708_PSP_LSEplan case to modify the Southern Nevada Geothermal potential from 320 MWs to 1000 MWs.
38MMT_20210812_PSP_LSEplan_2020IEPR_2020IEPRHighEV_ReRun
RESOLVE case where GridLiance West performed a rerun of the CPUC’s case 38MMT-20210812-PSP-LSEplan-2020IEPR-2020IEPRHighEV case based on E3 staff recommendation regarding model stability.